Sometimes I think the drs are just ripping off the elderly. Visits and prescriptions are so expensive, So very costly using medical transportation just to have vitals checked, same questions asked, medicine list reviewed and changed—my mother is dying and her health will not be improved. She gets false hope and agrees to make follow up appointments. I’m at the point that I’m not trusting the medical staff. Seems there is a monetary interest investing in my mother's fate while they line their pockets. Is it abusive to deny my mother medical assistance for fixing things that cannot be repaired or even improved? She’s ready to join my father but the drs seem to be prolonging her life for their benefit and not hearing her wishes to let it be God’s will. What to do?
With hospice, the trips to specialists stop, and the hospice doctor becomes Mom's doctor. (Ending those relationships with the specialists is remarkably freeing.)
Once Mom's on with hospice, the whole focus on her care shifts to her comfort -- hers as well as yours. If you have a good hospice provider, it's a wonderful experience for everyone. If you aren't clicking with them, get another provider. They'll coordinate with the first company to make the change as seamless as possible.
I think we're all brainwashed into thinking it's 'the right thing to do' to extend our elders' lives to 100, even if they're living in misery, pain and advanced dementia, when it makes NO sense at all! Allowing nature to take its course is a much better alternative, in my opinion, than taking extreme and expensive (not to mention invasive) measures to keep them alive when there's no quality of life left!
Wishing you the best of luck devising a plan that works best for you and your mom.
When you say your mother is dying, what do you mean by that? Just because she's 92 or because there is a terminal issue or some sort? If she is actively dying or does not wish to treat her issues, perhaps looking into a hospice evaluation might be in order? Or at least finding out about shifting to palliative care?
With my 95 yo MIL, I ask my husband and her - if we go to see the "insert doctor like neurologist" and they say you need an operation will you do it? She says no and we agree so we don't do the appointment.
Does anyone go to these doc appointments with your mom?
Some things, like a proper prescription for glasses if she still needs them for TV or reading, etc., make sense.
But look at the purpose of the appointments and what can be gained? Neuro - why? Cardio - why? If there's an issue, will they operate? Would she want life prolonging surgery? All surgery has risks so at her age it's iffy at best for the risk/benefit analysis.
Although the OP's profile page includes a long list of their mother's health problems none of those things are imminently fatal and neither is her age - my mom was living independently with most of those same conditions in her early 90's. I was furious when a doctor told me "sometimes they just get tired" when I took my mother to the hospital seeking a reason for her sudden decline - ageism is real and not every 90 year old is teetering at death's door.
If I remember correctly, U of M hospital some years ago issued a mandate disallowing acceptance by doctors of any favors.
Some years ago I was waiting in the lobby for an appointment with a female PCP. It was around noontime, and I saw a delivery person arrive, deliver several lunches to the receptionist, then leave. Just on a gut feeling, I commented to the receptionist that it was generous of the medical firm to provide lunches for staff. She (perhaps in an unrecognized indiscretion) said that it wasn't the firm; it was a medical supplier (I don't recall of what).
That said a lot to me. After the appointment, I never went back to that practice. (And the ease with which the female doctor had recommended meds was just too unacceptable for me.)
I know my mom, with advanced CHF, was more than ready to go into hospice and end the constant round of doctor visits/hospitalizations/ rehab & recovery. When her cardiologist tried one "last ditch" effort and put her on a constant infusion pump treatment, she said "enough", told her cardiologist she wanted the PICC line removed and hospice brought onboard.
There are a lot of reasons that doctors continue to push to treat patients that seem to have no real hope of recovery. I am sure in some instances greed plays a part, as does fear of litigation; however, I believe that not only are many of them (the medical people) hardwired to "do something", many of them have forged long relationships with their patients, and don't want to seem to be "giving up" on their patients. It's for the patient - or their advocate if the patient is unable - to make clear their wishes to their doctors.
If mom has said to you something to the effect of she's getting tired of all the appointments, all the poking and prodding, the never-ending cycle of treatments that don't seem to be of much use, you need to ask her how she feels about seeking hospice/palliative care, and then encourage HER to make her wishes known to her doctors. Certainly be there to support and advocate for her while she does it, but it seemed to me that once my mom was the one who spoke up the doctor was much more willing to engage in the conversation about hospice.
You and mom are in my prayers; this isn't easy for any of us to get through; there are many of us who have stood right where you are now. Making the decision is really the hardest part of the equation; at least it was for us.
Good luck and hugs.
This is an interesting article on the no harm issue:
https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/first-do-no-harm-201510138421
There's also another side of the issue of medical treatment, regular appointments, and their value: People have become so litigious, and from what I've especially read at various sites on the Internet, including here, do NOT understand what constitutes malpractice. And sometimes it's difficult to discern, as well as determining whether treatment is appropriate for the condition and circumstances.
So they think: SUE! PI lawyers have contributed to this swell of litigation. This was kind of a joke at some of the white shoe law firms where I worked: if you can't go into transactional, international or similar levels of law, you can always be a personal injury lawyer. "Ambulance chasing" is an appropriate description.
Plaintiff and defense law has changed drastically since I first worked at a defense firm.
When I was in an accident in 2014, having been hit by a truck which was hit by a driver not paying attention to her driving, within about a week I was contacted by half a dozen (or maybe more) chasers trying to convince me to discuss suing.
Apparently they get police reports (and I hope the police charge a large fee!) and then contact people involved.
So there are two contributing factors at the legal level that encourage people to think that suing is an answer. Doctors need to protect themselves from unfounded accusations and suits. One of the ways they CAN do that is to ensure that patients are seen regularly, tested, and monitored.
The other contributing aspect of ambulance chasing attorneys and aggrieved patients/relatives who don't understand the basics of medical malpractice.